- #Ableton live lite vs pro tools first install#
- #Ableton live lite vs pro tools first software#
- #Ableton live lite vs pro tools first free#
YOu do NOT have to tell the DAW where to record the track - that is all done automatically. There is no assign matrix, sel-sync, or anything like that. wav file of what you just played that is "married" to the channel you created. You create a track and name it as whatever you plan to record (ie: bass). You record directly to a DAW and there is no routing or deciding which track you are going to use. I admit that when I first loaded it and tried to use it I was baffled, because I was trained in the world of analog tape where there is an actual mechanical device recording the sound.ĭAWs have one major difference that make them 100% different from analog. I was also fully trained at 24-trk analog and got Protools as my first DAW without anyone guiding me along the way. But, the learning curves are steep for most any recording system.
#Ableton live lite vs pro tools first software#
The good news is that there are tons of inexpensive software and hardware out there that can be used to make some good recordings. There are a lot of rabbit holes in any DAW where signals can get lost. If an input signal doesn’t make it to the output, it took a wrong turn and you’ve got to play traffic cop and reroute the signal until it reaches the output. For every input, there must be an output. Regardless of version, one must commit some time to learning the basics.
#Ableton live lite vs pro tools first free#
However, a novice can get a free version called Pro Tools First, and actually make some useable recordings. It is a massive and complex system of signal processing that sets the standard by which all other software is measured. I now think I can effectively use maybe 40% of the Pro Tools’ architecture. I took four very difficult exams and became a Certified Pro Tools Operator. I recently completed 50 hours of Pro Tools live online classroom training with interactive WebEx audio and video. Reaper is great! Pro Tools is great too but SUPER expensive. There will definitely be a learning curve, but being confident with the basics of a computer system will go a long way towards you being able to help yourself learn the DAW.
#Ableton live lite vs pro tools first install#
Do you consider yourself a 'computer person'? I don't mean that you need to be a computer programmer, but rather than you can install updates, google minor problems, etc without it being a major issue. Every DAW is similar but different, so if you can run one, you can run them all with (hopefully) minor adjustments. One thing I should caution you about is that no matter which DAW you choose, you're going to run into 'picky' stuff that will drive you nuts until you get used to it.
But that's just me, I want my recordings to sound like a band in a room. Of course, Pro Tools has the best plug-ins because that's what the pros use, but Reaper's aren't bad either, and honestly if I find myself needing too many plug-ins to get a good sound, I might as well re-record that part anyway. I much prefer using a regular DAW for tracking and mixing, but of course you can track and mix in Abelton as well, I just find it clunky and unintuitive (for me at least).īefore you spend thousands of dollars on Pro Tools, why not give Reaper a shot? You can play around with the (fully functional!) demo version for as long as you want, and if you decide to buy, it's literally 60 bucks. I like using Ableton Live with a hardware device like a Push controller to create beats and loops.
Just my 2 cents, but I consider Abelton Live to be more of a sequencer / looper first with some DAW features, and Pro Tools as more of a traditional DAW.
0 kommentar(er)
